what's the most surprising thing about this draft, folks? for instance see option 3 on page 5 and the nations on page 6 --- which of these may agree to quantified emission reduction commitments for 2013-2017?...everyone? ...if those commitments are allowed to be a bit vague? -- see option 3 on p5. Option 2 on page 5 --supplementarity to survive? why/why not? http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/awg14/eng/crp03.pdf comments my way...dont give up
------------------------------------------------------------
Mathew Carr, emissions markets, energy reporter. London Bloomberg News ph +44 207 073 3531 yahoo ID carr_mathew
